|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
metsfan718
  
| #1 posted June 20, 2009 at 12:01pm (EST)
edited November 5, 2009 at 12:04am (EST) |
This topic had many older posts which were moved here:
http://gametz.com/forum/General/topic/337245.html
|
metsfan718
| | #41 posted June 21, 2009 at 7:03am (EST) |
Yeah and Boston won in 2007 with a $150 million payroll so you cant say that in every situation. |
LiL_Ramsey
 
| #42 posted June 21, 2009 at 11:46am (EST)
edited June 21, 2009 at 11:49am (EST) |
AlphakirA wrote:
> I wish bratty kids knew their baseball, thanks for at least quoting him Feeb:
> http://ballhype.com/story/ny_mets_1962_history_lov...
>
> They've been known since the lovable losers since year one.
One blog proves everything.
How can you be the lovable losers when you've won a title within the last ~30 years, while the other team using the nickname hasn't won in over 100? Just another case of New York thinking they decide everything.
Rock Band forum |
Feeb
| | #43 posted June 21, 2009 at 1:57pm (EST) |
the mets are losers... end of argument. |
AlphakirA
 
(frozen)
| #44 posted June 21, 2009 at 5:07pm (EST)
edited June 21, 2009 at 5:14pm (EST) |
LiL_Ramsey wrote:
> AlphakirA wrote:
>> I wish bratty kids knew their baseball, thanks for at least quoting
> him Feeb:
>> http://ballhype.com/story/ny_mets_1962_history_lov...
>>
>> They've been known since the lovable losers since year one.
>
>
>
> One blog proves everything.
>
> How can you be the lovable losers when you've won a title within the
> last ~30 years, while the other team using the nickname hasn't won
> in over 100? Just another case of New York thinking they decide everything.
>
I take you off of filter for one day and I already regret it. feel free to google the term dickhead, there's thousands of sites saying the same thing. My father even has a shirt saying "Lovable Losers" with a faux 1962 logo. This is why you're a whiny, bratty, canoe rowing piece of crap. Hope something bad happens to you soon. Back to the list you go. |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #45 posted June 21, 2009 at 5:16pm (EST) |
Back to baseball, instead of letting a child continue to derail the topic:
I'm surprised both Mets and Phillies haven't made a move yet. Both teams have pretty terrible looking starting pitching and can't seem to beat teams they should be able to beat...Mets should just be happy Phillies are on to 6 in a row now. |
rpgfan
 
| | #46 posted June 21, 2009 at 8:32pm (EST) |
Good starting pitching is at a premium at this point. Not many sellers at this point. The Brewers need one badly with one starter demoted to AAA and another injured/arm fatigue.
 |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #47 posted June 21, 2009 at 9:07pm (EST) |
Yup, it seems that way  I think Bedard is going to be the only guy really available that's worth a look at as a #2 for any team. |
SEspo
| | #48 posted June 21, 2009 at 9:16pm (EST) |
Fudging Yankees. |
LiL_Ramsey
| #49 posted June 21, 2009 at 11:04pm (EST)
edited June 21, 2009 at 11:07pm (EST) |
AlphakirA wrote:
> LiL_Ramsey wrote:
>> AlphakirA wrote:
> |>> I wish bratty kids knew their baseball, thanks for at least quoting
>> him Feeb:
> |>> http://ballhype.com/story/ny_mets_1962_history_lov...
> |>>
> |>> They've been known since the lovable losers since year one.
>>
>>
>>
>> One blog proves everything.
>>
>> How can you be the lovable losers when you've won a title within the
>> last ~30 years, while the other team using the nickname hasn't won
>> in over 100? Just another case of New York thinking they decide everything.
>>
>
> I take you off of filter for one day and I already regret it. feel free to google
> the term dickhead, there's thousands of sites saying the same thing. My father
> even has a shirt saying "Lovable Losers" with a faux 1962 logo. This is why
> you're a whiny, bratty, canoe rowing piece of crap. Hope something bad happens
> to you soon. Back to the list you go.
Yep, I'm the whiny and bratty one. Glad to see you haven't outgrown your little childish tantrums. Once again, try googling "lovable losers" instead of searching for it on your Mets websites.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=lovable+loser...
That's odd! Only Cubs stuff!
Rock Band forum |
Feeb
| | #50 posted June 21, 2009 at 11:40pm (EST) |
Methinks both teams have been called this, medoesn't give a crap either. How bout them Marlins? Watch out NL East! |
Suikoden
 
 
| | #51 posted June 21, 2009 at 11:48pm (EST) |
Mark Reynolds baby!
Has the top K's lol but he's having an amazing year
At times,I hate to practice,but I love to play.I know I need to study and I know I need to practice and I know how important it is.That doesn't mean I have to like it. The question I have to ask myself is am I willing to do that?And the answer is yes |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #52 posted June 22, 2009 at 3:12am (EST) |
Pujols hits his 3rd GS of the year...this guy isn't human. He went 4-5 with 2 HRs and 6 RBIs. |
metsfan718
| | #53 posted June 22, 2009 at 4:31am (EST) |
What did I say about those Rockies everyone? 36-33 now with a better record than the Mets. I think they are for real. |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #54 posted June 22, 2009 at 4:42am (EST) |
I don't buy it. They're 1-8 against the Dodgers and have too many holes to compete all year. |
metsfan718
| | #55 posted June 22, 2009 at 4:45am (EST) |
Well see... |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #56 posted June 22, 2009 at 4:46am (EST) |
Stop trying to take my spot for bold predictions, I'm still waiting on you to agree that the Yankees are not playoff material  |
mentalpowers
| | #57 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:10am (EST) |
AlphakirA wrote:
> Pujols hits his 3rd GS of the year...this guy isn't human. He went
> 4-5 with 2 HRs and 6 RBIs.
He's the only good thing about the National League.
|
Feeb
| | #58 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:36am (EST) |
metsfan718 wrote:
> What did I say about those Rockies everyone? 36-33 now with a better
> record than the Mets. I think they are for real.
Rockies, I agree. |
metsfan718
| | #59 posted June 22, 2009 at 2:08pm (EST) |
Also the Giants are 37-31. Their starting pitching is great.. If the Mets want to make the playoffs they have to get past a good amount of teams. |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #60 posted June 22, 2009 at 6:10pm (EST) |
They really only need to get past one - one with terrible starting pitching and one that they can and have beat in the past. |
kess
| | #61 posted June 22, 2009 at 6:20pm (EST) |
... but it never happens because they get swept by teams like the Pirates. |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #62 posted June 22, 2009 at 6:29pm (EST) |
We're the anti-Yankees, we win against teams that are as good or better than us, but Washington, Pirates and the Marlins are our toughest opponents. |
metsfan718
| | #63 posted June 22, 2009 at 6:58pm (EST) |
Beltran on DL. The Mets are in a hole. |
refloc
| | #64 posted June 22, 2009 at 6:58pm (EST) |
Amazing, now Beltran is headed to the DL. |
kess
| | #65 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:02pm (EST) |
Who let Pete and Repeat in here? |
metsfan718
| | #66 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:05pm (EST) |
refloc wrote:
> Amazing, now Beltran is headed to the DL.
Weird same timing lol. Also the Mets medical staff is horrible letting Beltran play and aggravating his knee even more. |
refloc
| | #67 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:12pm (EST) |
metsfan718 wrote:
> refloc wrote:
>> Amazing, now Beltran is headed to the DL.
>
> Weird same timing lol. Also the Mets medical staff is horrible letting
> Beltran play and aggravating his knee even more.
With that kind of injury it should be up to the player to tell the staff if he feels ready enough to play. The medical staff can't tell how much his knee is hurting him |
DirtyMarco
| | #68 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:18pm (EST) |
I'm sure they forced him to play against his will.
 |
SEspo
| | #69 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:21pm (EST) |
All players want to play.. it's up to the medical staff to tell them. |
metsfan718
| | #70 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:36pm (EST) |
refloc wrote:
> metsfan718 wrote:
>> refloc wrote:
> |>> Amazing, now Beltran is headed to the DL.
>>
>> Weird same timing lol. Also the Mets medical staff is horrible
> letting
>> Beltran play and aggravating his knee even more.
>
> With that kind of injury it should be up to the player to tell the
> staff if he feels ready enough to play. The medical staff can't tell
> how much his knee is hurting him
Everybody knew that he was hurting days ago. He SHOULD NOT of been in that fudging lineup yesterday. It's a horrible job by the medical staff and there's no excuse. |
metsfan718
| | #71 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:37pm (EST) |
DirtyMarco wrote:
> I'm sure they forced him to play against his will.
>
Agreed 100%. Their lineup is already depleted so they forced him to play. |
DirtyMarco
| | #72 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:38pm (EST) |
I was being sarcastic. I am sure that if he had said "hey I'm hurting I need to rest" that they would not have played him. If he did say that and they played him anyway he probably needs to call the Players union....
|
metsfan718
| | #73 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:41pm (EST) |
Yeah but it could happen especially with this medical staff. |
metsfan718
| | #74 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:45pm (EST) |
Also I hope that you are joking with the players union.especially with Beltran who is making almost 20 million a year. He would never complain against them |
DirtyMarco
| | #75 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:47pm (EST) |
But you can't really put a price on your health can you?
|
Feeb
| | #76 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:47pm (EST) |
SEspo wrote:
> All players want to play.. it's up to the medical staff to tell them.
>
They stop being players after college, they're workers in MLB... they want the paycheck. |
metsfan718
| | #77 posted June 22, 2009 at 7:54pm (EST) |
DirtyMarco wrote:
> But you can't really put a price on your health can you?
>
As long as it's not life threatening then yeah... And hey you get a vacation |
metsfan718
| | #78 posted June 23, 2009 at 2:15am (EST) |
Mets won! Game and a half behind! Also look at those Rockies they won again! |
AlphakirA
(frozen)
| | #79 posted June 23, 2009 at 6:25am (EST) |
Mets released 5 guys yesterday...Hey Mets, you're doing it wrong. |
GonePostal
| | #80 posted June 23, 2009 at 6:36am (EST) |
kess wrote:
> ... but it never happens because they get swept by teams
> like the Pirates.
Why do you always have to force me to + you?
Visit the GameTZ Official Sports Discussion Forum |
|
|
Rules Help 
- Twitter 
- Facebook 
