|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
CoachMcGuirk
  
 
| | #1 posted June 26, 2009 at 7:52am (EST) |
Don't know how taxing this would be on your system, but:
Is there a way to show the overall average of scores that a user has, given his posts?
I would imagine colon would be in the positive column, and OrgXII in the negative.
Black Hole Brew pub is open for business! Drunken ramblings encouraged! |
bill
  
| | #2 posted June 26, 2009 at 8:52am (EST) |
Isn't this what you want?
http://gametz.com/?A=Scores&period=week&table=Foru... ? |
Forgotten_Freshness
 
| | #3 posted June 26, 2009 at 9:41am (EST) |
I love that feature.
 |
Organization_XIII
 
| | #4 posted June 26, 2009 at 10:27am (EST) |
What the fudge! I have the most (-) in a year's time?
|
Chadical
 
| | #5 posted June 26, 2009 at 10:41am (EST) |
Not the highest in one post though.
that would be Ampeggs.
 |
Organization_XIII
| | #6 posted June 26, 2009 at 10:50am (EST) |
Still. The next closest guy to me is still 2000 negs behind me for the year.
|
millenium_dare
 
| | #7 posted June 26, 2009 at 11:02am (EST) |
Bill, what does the "scorers" tab account for?
|
Chad
| | #8 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:10pm (EST) |
you still need to somehow archive scores. i think i speak for everyone when I say it is the most important feature on the site. |
Grenadier
| | #9 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:13pm (EST) |
By archive, do you mean make an "all time" list, added to the existing week/month/year choice?
Click here to join Goozex! |
BJB
| | #10 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:21pm (EST) |
i think thats wat he means but wouldnt that be impossible? Ud have to go thru a decade of records correct?
Promo Marketplace
http://gametz.com/forum/USER%3A114794
 |
Chad
| | #11 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:25pm (EST) |
Correct.
And you wouldn't have to go through a decade, the scoring system is pretty new and so far, once its archived its lost forever. |
BJB
| | #12 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:29pm (EST) |
ah ok.
Promo Marketplace
http://gametz.com/forum/USER%3A114794
|
Forgotten_Freshness
| | #13 posted June 26, 2009 at 1:44pm (EST) |
I agree. Seeing all time scores would be awesome.
|
bill
| | #14 posted June 26, 2009 at 3:21pm (EST) |
The forum archive is problematic (too big)... I'm not even sure I'll be able to keep the posts let alone scores.
scorers - the people casting the most +/- votes (actually it counts an average per user... so you can see who is plusing or negging the most, on average)
|
Chad
| | #15 posted June 26, 2009 at 4:28pm (EST) |
dont need all scored posts, just those that are +/- 10 |
Chadical
| | #16 posted June 26, 2009 at 6:18pm (EST) |
I think it would be kinda cool if you could spend only the points you obtain. It would give people more incentive to post better things instead of threadcrap I think.
|
Chad
| | #17 posted June 26, 2009 at 6:22pm (EST) |
and i think it would be kinda cool if you shut up. |
Forgotten_Freshness
| | #18 posted June 26, 2009 at 6:23pm (EST) |
There can be only one.
|
Chadical
| | #19 posted June 26, 2009 at 6:59pm (EST) |
I really don't care he'll be frozen soon.
|
Chad
| | #20 posted June 26, 2009 at 7:27pm (EST) |
thems fightin words. |
Chadical
| #21 posted June 26, 2009 at 7:34pm (EST)
edited June 26, 2009 at 7:35pm (EST) |
I will fight you.
|
oulzac
 
| | #22 posted June 26, 2009 at 9:07pm (EST) |
I would pay money to see that.
--------
When I don't get my bath, I take it out on the slaves. |
Chad
| | #23 posted June 26, 2009 at 9:25pm (EST) |
how much? |
oulzac
| | #24 posted June 26, 2009 at 9:47pm (EST) |
$10 to the winner only.
--------
When I don't get my bath, I take it out on the slaves. |
Chad
| | #25 posted June 26, 2009 at 9:51pm (EST) |
well thats hardly enough to justify a 2000 mile trip. |
Forgotten_Freshness
| | #26 posted June 27, 2009 at 1:25am (EST) |
What if enough of us pool $10?
|
CoachMcGuirk
| | #27 posted June 27, 2009 at 1:33am (EST) |
bill wrote:
> Isn't this what you want?
>
> http://gametz.com/?A=Scores&period=week&table=Foru...
> ?
What I mean is an overall average per posts.
Say I have 5 posts, and their scores are 0, 14, -7, 4, and -1. The average of that would be 18-8 = 10/5 = 2.
Black Hole Brew pub is open for business! Drunken ramblings encouraged! |
BJB
| | #28 posted June 27, 2009 at 1:41am (EST) |
how about u jus thank Bill for wat u have and leave it at that
Promo Marketplace
http://gametz.com/forum/USER%3A114794
|
Chadical
| | #29 posted June 27, 2009 at 2:50am (EST) |
Only if this is a battle to the death. I don't do no pussy exhibition bullcrap.
|
bill
| | #30 posted June 27, 2009 at 7:23am (EST) |
CoachMcGuirk - I still think we're talking about the same thing. |
CoachMcGuirk
| | #31 posted June 27, 2009 at 8:00am (EST) |
I think the only difference between what you posted in #2 and what I was asking for is the division by number of posts. In #27 I would have a score of 10 under the scores list you already have in place. What that one is doing is taking the overall sum -- not the overall average.
Black Hole Brew pub is open for business! Drunken ramblings encouraged! |
DirtyMarco
| | #32 posted June 27, 2009 at 10:35am (EST) |
Chad wrote:
> well thats hardly enough to justify a 2000 mile trip.
You could meet halfway!!!!!
 |
bill
| | #33 posted June 27, 2009 at 3:05pm (EST) |
CoachMcGuirk - ah, I see. But, your number will be watered down by all the zero score posts... I assume most people will have an average between -1 and 1.
Actually, given the way the calculaton is done, it's hard to do it that way. The Scores pages, just counts up scores, but a post without any scores would not even be seen. I'd have to go about it the other way, counting all posts, then seeing if any also had scores... Maybe Duffman could help me create SQL to do that, it would have to be some kind of compound query. |
bill
| | #34 posted June 27, 2009 at 3:14pm (EST) |
OK... I tried to generate an example of what you're talking about...
Using forum posts and scores since midnight June 26th, I have 132 forum posts by you. And your total score is -42.
So, your average would be -42 / 132 or -0.3182.
I guess if that was compared to others, could could sort of see someone's overall performance here. But, the numbers will be small, fractional things. |
The_U
 
| | #35 posted June 27, 2009 at 4:34pm (EST) |
just multiply all numbers by 1000 so we can get real numbers.
bill wrote:
> OK... I tried to generate an example of what you're talking about...
>
> Using forum posts and scores since midnight June 26th, I have 132
> forum posts by you. And your total score is -42.
> So, your average would be -42 / 132 or -0.3182.
>
> I guess if that was compared to others, could could sort of see someone's
> overall performance here. But, the numbers will be small, fractional
> things.
I live in a tiny island in the Caribbean.
FML. |
Grenadier
| | #36 posted June 27, 2009 at 5:03pm (EST) |
The_U wrote:
> just multiply all numbers by 1000 so we can get real numbers.
The differences will still be tiny, since then everything will be in a range of -1000 to 1000, but with negligible differences from one to the next. Your "real" numbers are just an illusion created by scaling the numbers x 1000.
Click here to join Goozex! |
DirtyMarco
| | #37 posted June 27, 2009 at 10:02pm (EST) |
Let's multiply all the numbers by i that way none of the numbers will be real.
|
CoachMcGuirk
| | #38 posted June 28, 2009 at 8:21am (EST) |
bill wrote:
> CoachMcGuirk - ah, I see. But, your number will be watered down by
> all the zero score posts... I assume most people will have an average
> between -1 and 1.
>
> Actually, given the way the calculaton is done, it's hard to do it
> that way. The Scores pages, just counts up scores, but a post without
> any scores would not even be seen. I'd have to go about it the other
> way, counting all posts, then seeing if any also had scores... Maybe
> Duffman could help me create SQL to do that, it would have to be some
> kind of compound query.
Maybe you can somehow disregard all of the 0 posts?
Black Hole Brew pub is open for business! Drunken ramblings encouraged! |
bill
| | #39 posted June 28, 2009 at 10:14am (EST) |
I was thinking that would be the same as the sum number, but I guess it would be sum / count (of scored posts) ...
It still ends up being a smallish fractional number, I think. *shrug*
|
CoachMcGuirk
| | #40 posted June 29, 2009 at 2:21am (EST) |
Eh, it was just something I kinda wanted to see. Like if you had an overall positive number, most of what you were posting on the forums was generally liked, and vice versa for a negative.
I took a major hit from the Michael Jackson popcorn spamming from a couple days ago, though 
Black Hole Brew pub is open for business! Drunken ramblings encouraged! |
|
|
Rules Help 
- Twitter 
- Facebook 
