> I understand the need for DLC but $30 a pop for each expansion is steep to me. They
> might as well just have come out with a 3rd Pokemon game this generation at $60.
> I cannot imagine both expansions tallying the length of a full game. I mean if it
> does then that's fine, but I doubt it. And does anyone else find it shady that only
> a month or so ago Game Freak states they have no plans to add anymore Pokemon to
> Sword/Shield and now this? I'm not really buying the whole this was for the fans
> because of "backlash". Seems too convenient for me. I think they had this planned
> from the get.
Oh, are they $30 each? I thought it was $30 for both. That changes my opinion quite a bit. I don't think they showed enough content to justify that much money. Maybe a follow-up game for the same price would have been better after all, especially when it would be easier to get it on sale that way.