> sharif wrote:
>> SRPGs are never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever going to make for a good
>> game of the month. It's as simple as that. You like them, you play them. Also
>> Moon is a hilariously bad idea since there's no real end goal, good as the game
>> The point is to beat the game, and not have to take 20 hours to do it.
> Calm down. Beat em ups are mediocre at best. They may be the absolute worst choices
> for games of the month because they are so monotonous and boring. The point of game
> of the month is not just to "beat it" its to share something with other people who
> are having the same experience and bring people together ...... kind of.
> At least that's what my understanding of playing together is.
> I get why you might think certain games are terrible choices. But I was under the
> impression you have a hard time passing many games that weren't so easy they aren't
> even an accomplishment to pass. Sure some people use the excuse I don't have time
> for "so and so" game. But you have time to play a game that isn't fun just to say
> you did it? Shining Force does take a while. Harvest moon is just fun. Golden axe
> is okay but it's the main reason I didn't pick astyanax. It'll take me a little bit
> but I will get an original copy of astyanax this month. I had no way to play the
> games the last two months so I didn't get to participate.
> The way I look at it playing "let's play together" is a choice to spend that time
> (or not) playing the game of the month you may happen to like. Any amount of time
> you play any of these games is time you could be spending doing something else. Stop
> with the bs excuses.
I also agree I don't understand why they always have to be short games. Only like 2 people are beating the game anyway so what difference does it make which game is played?