|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
guncrazy90
  
| | #1 posted November 7, 2009 at 11:17pm (EST) |
Seriously, the Sheesh wannabes are getting really old, really fast
 |
Iced
 
 
| | #2 posted November 7, 2009 at 11:21pm (EST) |
There are no Sheesh wannabes.
 |
guncrazy90
| | #3 posted November 7, 2009 at 11:22pm (EST) |
I can think of a few
|
Chadical
 
 
| | #4 posted November 7, 2009 at 11:41pm (EST) |
2 inpaticular.
 |
ndrake
 
| | #5 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:50am (EST) |
Seriously, the Glenn Beck wannabes are getting really old, really fast |
Richie
 
| | #6 posted November 8, 2009 at 1:45am (EST) |
ndrake wrote:
> Seriously, the Glenn Beck wannabes are getting really old,
> really fast
You beat me to it. 
 |
ryanflucas
 
| | #7 posted November 8, 2009 at 1:59am (EST) |
Names are needed. |
Chadical
| | #8 posted November 8, 2009 at 2:06am (EST) |
Uh I don't wanna name any names but uh.....Kokopelli and Iowa Cowboy
oh wait...crap.
|
Iced
| #9 posted November 8, 2009 at 2:20am (EST)
edited November 8, 2009 at 2:20am (EST) |
Well like I said, there are no Sheesh wannabes. kokopelli is Sheesh, and Iowa Cowboy is his own, HILARIOUS human being.
|
Grimlock
| | #10 posted November 8, 2009 at 2:42am (EST) |
I liked the gay cloud man better, Iced. |
DrizzDrizzDrizz
 
| | #11 posted November 8, 2009 at 6:06am (EST) |
I don't see why you would ban them. If kokopelli makes a topic of a political nature, you click it if you're willing and ready to read what's inside. You don't click if you're not. Nobody will force you, I promise. And if you absolutely can't handle reading someone's posts, which is something I don't personally understand, then just filter them and bam, your gametz existence will be at peace again.
And if anyone ever suggests that Roger Poole is not a huge asset to this site, I will do my best to hurt your feelings. He's a gold mine, a contemporary comedic genius. One can only hope the doubters will one day realize that.
Smile Now Cry Later |
Gooseman
| | #12 posted November 8, 2009 at 8:48am (EST) |
DrizzDrizzDrizz wrote:
> I don't see why you would ban them. If kokopelli makes
> a topic of a political nature, you click it if you're
> willing and ready to read what's inside. You don't
> click if you're not. Nobody will force you, I promise.
> And if you absolutely can't handle reading someone's
> posts, which is something I don't personally understand,
> then just filter them and bam, your gametz existence
> will be at peace again.
> And if anyone ever suggests that Roger Poole is not
> a huge asset to this site, I will do my best to hurt
> your feelings. He's a gold mine, a contemporary comedic
> genius. One can only hope the doubters will one day
> realize that.
>
>
I think the doubters will come to a realization when they, the political retards, are dead. Only till after they've died are the greatest minds ever appreciated. We can only hope that they die soon so that they get the notoriety that they have earned.
The Gametz Newcomer Info Zone <Click here for help. |
DirtyMarco
| | #13 posted November 8, 2009 at 9:43am (EST) |
BAN EVERYONE.
Also Roger Poole is starting to grow on me..............but only because Drizz likes him. |
iowa_cowboy1968
| | #14 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:00am (EST) |
Good morning everyone, just thought I would throw in my opinion.....if people here have a problem with conversing with others that have a higher IQ then a rock, I strongly suggest that Christian and Chad create their own thread where they can sit in a corner with each other, check each other for head lice and smell each others ass. Because frankly, any other advanced communication is way beyond their cranium intake. |
DirtyMarco
| | #15 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:07am (EST) |
I'm starting to understand why Drizz likes you. I have a suggestion. Rather than insulting each other why don't we once a week set a topic in general and discuss it. Any topic. The only rule will be no insulting one another. Just discuss the issues and your opinion on it. I for one would enjoy it. You should pick the first topic Roger. |
iowa_cowboy1968
| | #16 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:16am (EST) |
any topic? no boundaries? ie.religion,law,,politics, ect. |
DirtyMarco
| | #17 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:19am (EST) |
Whatever you want. Although I would prefer that we not talk about protestors or Glenn beck. Just label it WEEKLY Discussion topic: "Insert the topic here" |
iowa_cowboy1968
| | #18 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:24am (EST) |
ok Marco, I tell you what, if we can get 7 people to commit on this thread to engage in a WEEKLY Discussion topic thread and talk rationally WITHOUT insulting ANYONE.......we can do this. I will be the first to pledge that I will NOT insult anyone on the upcoming weekly threads, That I will conduct myself that proper to the discussion...If you will be the second Marco, we will need 5 more. Good Idea Marco |
DirtyMarco
| | #19 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:25am (EST) |
I'll take that pledge. |
iowa_cowboy1968
| | #20 posted November 8, 2009 at 10:32am (EST) |
ANYONE ELSE? |
Iced
| | #21 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:20am (EST) |
iowa_cowboy1968 wrote:
> higher IQ then a rock
|
kokopelli
| | #22 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:26am (EST) |
How about we ban retards, period?
You know, those that can't hold a candle in a debate, get their internet feelings hurt, and then run to the boss-man yelling "ban! ban! ban!".
Fudging lightweights. |
iowa_cowboy1968
| | #23 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:42am (EST) |
Is there anyone here who can take the pledge or is it that you cannot have an intelligent discussion without trying to belittle someone to strengthen your point of view in your eyes???? I am starting to wonder about a few people here if THAT is the issue. |
Iced
| | #24 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:42am (EST) |
I can't wait for Sheesh 3: Season of the Witch.
|
Knight
 
| | #25 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:44am (EST) |
Iced your new forum avatar sucks, bring back the new one.
--
|
Iced
| #26 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:45am (EST)
edited November 8, 2009 at 11:46am (EST) |
BONK DOES NOT SUCKS; YOU SUCKS!!!!!!
Edit: Or are you talking about the smaller version of my PSN logo?
|
Knight
| | #27 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:45am (EST) |
MOAR.
--
|
SmarmySir
| | #28 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:49am (EST) |
kokopelli wrote:
> How about we ban retards, period?
>
> You know, those that can't hold a candle in a debate, get their internet feelings
> hurt, and then run to the boss-man yelling "ban! ban! ban!".
>
> Fudging lightweights.
Yeah, that's what you did before, remember? Well, new username, new leaf, eh?
----------------------------------------------
Signature. |
kokopelli
| | #29 posted November 8, 2009 at 11:56am (EST) |
Grow some hair with those balls, guys. Your whole life you've wanted to be adults.
Act like one instead of crying like babies when you don't get your way. |
Iced
| | #30 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:13pm (EST) |
No doubt, guys. Quit being so childish. Sheesh!
|
kokopelli
| | #31 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:24pm (EST) |
Dick towels, eh?
I rest my case. |
Iced
| | #32 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:25pm (EST) |
Yeah. Dick towels.
|
kokopelli
| #33 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:27pm (EST)
edited November 8, 2009 at 12:27pm (EST) |
27 and single.
There is a reason, no doubt. |
Iced
| | #34 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:27pm (EST) |
jerk TAG NO TAG-BACKS
|
Iced
| | #35 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:28pm (EST) |
Where does it state in my bio that I'm single, super sleuth?
|
kokopelli
| #36 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:28pm (EST)
edited November 8, 2009 at 12:29pm (EST) |
I am a homosexual. Being a "name for a cigarette" is a my way of life. |
Iced
| | #37 posted November 8, 2009 at 12:49pm (EST) |
Iced wrote:
> Where does it state in my bio that I'm single, super sleuth?
>
Y'see, this is why no one wants to engage in "intelligent conversation" with you: you blatantly ignore the posts that don't make you look good. You've always done this.
|
kokopelli
| #38 posted November 8, 2009 at 1:22pm (EST)
edited November 8, 2009 at 1:25pm (EST) |
Given I've only been around for a month or so, I didn't know that I've "always done this" or anything else on these boards.
I'm so sorry I didn't meet your immediate needs. I completely understand your youth-like issues with premature.....I mean.... impatience.
Remember: Life is not all about you.
I don't know that you are single, only guessing from your behavior, previous posts/topics, and that you spend so much time here on these boards. |
Iced
| | #39 posted November 8, 2009 at 1:28pm (EST) |
kokopelli wrote:
> Given I've only been around for a month or so, I didn't know that
> I've "always done this" or anything else on these boards.
>
You know exactly what I'm getting at.
> I'm so sorry I didn't meet your immediate needs. I completely understand
> your youth-like issues with premature.....I mean.... impatience.
>
You consider 27 to be youthful? Another clue. I'm squint-eyed'ely making note of it.
> I don't know that you are single, only guessing from your behavior,
> previous posts/topics, and that you spend so much time here on these
> boards.
See? Sleuthing can get you somewhere. You deduced correctly, and only from a limited amount of evidence.
Now, imagine how accurately one could deduce something with a wealth of evidence?
|
guncrazy90
| | #40 posted November 8, 2009 at 2:35pm (EST) |
Dick towels are awesome. They get chics hot
|
|
|
Rules Help 
- Twitter 
- Facebook 
