|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
benstylus
  
 
| | #1 posted August 27, 2008 at 5:15pm (EST) |
bill, just wondering if you have any records (or if it's even tracked) on things like:
most / fewest trades pended in a single day
most / fewest users online at a time
most / fewest forum posts in a single day
It would be interesting to see some of those numbers if they are available. Then we could try and break some records - it'd be like the gametz olympics 
Riding the rainbows of manliness |
mmm40x
 
| | #2 posted August 27, 2008 at 5:44pm (EST) |
YAY! More pointless, meaningless posts!  |
BoB
  
 
| | #3 posted August 27, 2008 at 5:49pm (EST) |
was there another kind?
dog, you never played FF8? - Vdub |
mmm40x
| | #4 posted August 27, 2008 at 5:52pm (EST) |
lol. Good point. |
bill
 
| | #5 posted August 27, 2008 at 8:13pm (EST) |
it's kind of hard to do per-day stats... I have an overall trades per day graph...
 |
willyum
 
| | #6 posted August 27, 2008 at 9:19pm (EST) |
Was that plot done in Matlab? For some reason it reminds me of Matlab...
 |
kess
 
| | #7 posted August 27, 2008 at 9:55pm (EST) |
I love that whenever stats are mentioned bill just posts that same graph.
 |
Noltillian
 
| | #8 posted August 27, 2008 at 10:01pm (EST) |
 |
bill
| | #9 posted August 27, 2008 at 10:11pm (EST) |
I have some other graphs...
They are generated by GD, really basic stuff. |
willyum
| | #10 posted August 27, 2008 at 10:14pm (EST) |
Oh...still reminds me of Matlab for some reason... ¬_¬
|
Felty
| | #11 posted August 27, 2008 at 10:21pm (EST) |
Has the Noob Pending forum and the Mentors helped cut down on BTR's? (I don't remember if I asked before) |
bill
| | #12 posted August 28, 2008 at 7:02am (EST) |
This month's Rip-off ratio: 0.7% (1 in 137 trades)
That's 1 BTR for every 137 trades. I think that's pretty good, maybe better than usual. I think we may have had it as low as 0.5% in the past, though.
I don't track or graph this stat. But, I have posted it in the forums before.
Here's what I found after a quick search:
February 25, 2008: 0.9% (1 in 117 trades)
May 4, 2001: 1.8% (1 in 57 trades)
I don't know how meaningful that is, though. Lots of missing data. Also, the way BTRs tend to run is periods of calm, then some big disaster. We haven't had a disaster in a while, I think. Though, that may well be because of our efforts. We have stopped several scammers early in recent months.
Also, trades have been up (see above graph), so that really helps the ratio. Though, the ratio is still a good stat (BTRs/trade). |
DirtyMarco
| | #13 posted August 28, 2008 at 3:34pm (EST) |
For the record bill is that one standing BTR for this month or is that total filed. |
bill
| #14 posted August 28, 2008 at 4:50pm (EST)
edited August 28, 2008 at 4:51pm (EST) |
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
The current stat say this month's Rip-off ratio: 0.7% (1 in 138 trades) -- slight change from yesterday.
The full numbers are 13 BTRs and 1,794 trades over the last 30 days. So, 13/1794 = 0.007246 , multiply that by 100 to turn it into a percent and we get 0.7246 or 0.7% for short. 1 in 138 is just reducing the fraction of 13 / 1794. I add that just to make it more understandable. Over the last month, for every 138 completed trades, there was 1 BTR. |
benstylus
| | #15 posted August 28, 2008 at 5:08pm (EST) |
does that count re-filed or edited btrs as well?
Riding the rainbows of manliness |
bill
| | #16 posted August 28, 2008 at 6:02pm (EST) |
It count active BTRs (not deleted). edited doesn't matter... I don't know what you mean by re-filed... BTRs are active or deleted... or purged (don't exist anymore). |
Sheesh
| | #17 posted August 28, 2008 at 6:10pm (EST) |
I have a statistical request, too!
A few weeks ago you (bill) made a change to the filter system, whereby people would no longer be given the option within a thread to see the filtered post. The only way that people can now see a filtered post is to unfilter that user.
I'm wondering the pre/post figures on the total number of filtered users.
Thanks!
 |
DirtyMarco
| | #18 posted August 28, 2008 at 7:35pm (EST) |
bill wrote:
> It count active BTRs
That's what I was asking |
BoB
| | #19 posted August 28, 2008 at 7:59pm (EST) |
haha i just noticed the avatar  nice one chris
dog, you never played FF8? - Vdub |
bill
| | #20 posted August 28, 2008 at 8:23pm (EST) |
Sheesh - I can't give that stat, don't know what it used to be. |
Uuaww
| | #21 posted August 28, 2008 at 8:32pm (EST) |
what happens if you get rid of RV03? then how good is it? |
Sheesh
| | #22 posted August 28, 2008 at 8:35pm (EST) |
Thanks!
I seem to recall the number of filtered users being brought up a month or so ago. I remember you providing a total number of filtered users figure.
Can you please provide the current total number of filtered users figure?
Thank you
|
John
| | #23 posted August 28, 2008 at 8:57pm (EST) |
Wasn't that change only like a week ago? Has it really been a few weeks?
- John...
I kissed a girl.
(And I liked it.) |
Uuaww
| | #24 posted August 28, 2008 at 9:27pm (EST) |
yeah a list of the most filtered would be nice, also like to know how much ive been filtered if any haha. |
bill
| | #25 posted August 29, 2008 at 6:23am (EST) |
I have a script that will generate the list of top people who are filtered. There's no total, though. It's not very accurate either because it counts filtered people even when the filterer is no longer subscribed (thus the filter isn't active).
Here's what it looks like:
theraweness 33
Organization_XIII 27
gog 22
Apoc 17
N/A 17
TMNT 15
Zelgadis 14
Sheesh 14
Oreo 14
FreakyMofoSpam 13
Kanes_Son 13
RainMan 13
GodofDestruction 13
Mute 12
invisibleink 12
WickedAngel 12
N/A 11
alpha_wolf 11
Johnstud56 11
Brad 11
hunt4kant 11
vDub 11
Chad 11
Jimmy 10
I_AM 10 |
bill
| | #26 posted August 29, 2008 at 6:23am (EST) |
I think the N/A is an account that no longer exists. |
CoachMcGuirk
| #27 posted August 29, 2008 at 8:31am (EST)
edited August 29, 2008 at 8:33am (EST) |
Another stat-based question: How long has the scoring system been in effect? We're not over a year yet, are we? If we are, would there be a way to get an 'all-time' for the period of length?
edit: also, what's the 'my-users' criteria mean again? |
bill
| | #28 posted August 29, 2008 at 9:30am (EST) |
I'm not sure... you could probably search for it in this forum to see when I announced it.
I don't think we're over a year yet. Yeah, maybe I could add an all-time option, though there could be a performance issue.
My users is a list of people you've scored the most positive or negative. |
benstylus
| | #29 posted August 29, 2008 at 9:53am (EST) |
Looks like Sheesh's number hasn't really changed.
Riding the rainbows of manliness |
Sheesh
| | #30 posted August 29, 2008 at 11:15am (EST) |
Thank you, bill.
|
_kate_
 
| #31 posted August 29, 2008 at 11:19am (EST)
edited August 29, 2008 at 11:23am (EST) |
Visuals! A visual aid!
 |
Noltillian
| | #32 posted August 29, 2008 at 11:35am (EST) |
lol at theawareness!
|
mmm40x
| | #33 posted August 29, 2008 at 1:24pm (EST) |
theawareness is BoB's fault. |
kzn
 
| | #34 posted August 29, 2008 at 1:28pm (EST) |
I dont even know who that is, but they top gog, that's gotta be some kind of record.
 |
Noltillian
| | #35 posted August 29, 2008 at 1:47pm (EST) |
psst... it's theraweness.
|
monkbonk
| | #36 posted August 29, 2008 at 3:24pm (EST) |
Of that I am aware |
_kate_
| | #37 posted August 29, 2008 at 10:10pm (EST) |
I see what you did there.
|
BoB
| | #38 posted August 29, 2008 at 10:27pm (EST) |
the rawness is cool i just had a fit when he questioned my godhood.
dog, you never played FF8? - Vdub |
TheHunt
| | #39 posted September 1, 2008 at 7:21pm (EST) |
that's cool. just as many filters as the almighty god of gametz, chad. even though i shouldn't be filtered even once, but whatever. |
Boss
| | #40 posted September 1, 2008 at 8:31pm (EST) |
That N/A might be m.
|
|
|
Rules Help 
