General

Topic The 22 GTOATs - Greatest Traders of All Time

Chad

* 29-Dec(#1)

I got bored so I went through and found all

traders with truly perfect 100% trade scores. What does that mean? Well, take someone like bill . On the surface, he looks like a great trader, 597 rating at 100% from 735 trades with 620 different traders. Impressive! But wait, when you click on the 100%, you see for Speed and Courtesy, bill is actually only a 99.9%. Shame on you, you slow, rude boy!

Instead, we will look at the truly shining examples that are 100% across the board

#22 - @Bofur 257 ratings
#21 - @LastEpoch 264 ratings
#20 - @philliesphan 267 ratings
#19 - @loztdogs 275 ratings
#18 - @theyrhere 277 ratings
#17 - @kevolones 293 ratings
#16 - @Gypsy 296 ratings
#15 - @TerrHeel 306 ratings
#14 - @AceMatt 307 ratings
#13 - @TapU0ut 329 ratings
#12 - @willyum 335 ratings
#11 - @Headshot 336 ratings
#10 - @devans77 343 ratings
#9 - @BucketofJustice 377 ratings
#8 - @Johnny 387 ratings
#7 - @mattyg00013 404 ratings
#6 - @back4more 438 ratings
#5 - @Porksta 441 ratings
#4 - @Dusk 484 ratings
#3 - @Killkernal 593 ratings
#2 - @Heavyd814life 645 ratings
#1 -
The greatest trader in the history of http://www.gametz.com, the one, the only

@Rollobobo with an astonishing 700 ratings.

....................................... Skipping Messages Here .......................................

Kommie

14-Jan(#41)

SublimeFan wrote:

> 306 ratings, 2 are not all excellent, 1 has speed "N/A" because it was lost in the

> mail.

from what I gather, N/A means not applicable. Like a digital transaction. So they tried to give you a bad rating but really didn't give you a rating at all.

SublimeFan

* 14-Jan(#42)

Kommie wrote:

> SublimeFan wrote:

>> 306 ratings, 2 are not all excellent, 1 has speed "N/A" because it was lost

> in the

>> mail.

> from what I gather, N/A means not applicable. Like a digital transaction. So they

> tried to give you a bad rating but really didn't give you a rating at all.

That's actually really dumb because I literally listed the reason which was the item was lost in the mail so speed didn't apply (as in NOT APPLICABLE, or "N/A"). We filed insurance for the item and it was paid. It's actually a TRUE rating because the item never made it, but the other two excellent ratings are applicable.

benstylus

14-Jan(#43)

SublimeFan wrote:

> Kommie wrote:

>> SublimeFan wrote:

> |>> 306 ratings, 2 are not all excellent, 1 has speed "N/A" because it was

> lost

>> in the

> |>> mail.

> |>>

>> from what I gather, N/A means not applicable. Like a digital transaction. So

> they

>> tried to give you a bad rating but really didn't give you a rating at all.

> That's actually really dumb because I literally listed the reason which was the item

> was lost in the mail so speed didn't apply (as in NOT APPLICABLE, or "N/A").

> We filed insurance for the item and it was paid. It's actually a TRUE rating because

> the item never made it, but the other two excellent ratings are applicable.

It would be really dumb to rate a user's speed based on how long it took the post office to deliver (or not deliver).

I would think speed of responding to messages, speed of sending (after trade penned or after receiving depending on terms of the trade).

The one aspect of a trade a user doesn't have control over is what happens once the package in possession of the courier.

SublimeFan

15-Jan(#44)

benstylus wrote:

> SublimeFan wrote:

>> Kommie wrote:

> |>> SublimeFan wrote:

>> |>> 306 ratings, 2 are not all excellent, 1 has speed "N/A" because it was

>> lost

> |>> in the

>> |>> mail.

>> |>>

> |>>

> |>> from what I gather, N/A means not applicable. Like a digital transaction. So

>> they

> |>> tried to give you a bad rating but really didn't give you a rating at all.

>> That's actually really dumb because I literally listed the reason which was the

> item

>> was lost in the mail so speed didn't apply (as in NOT APPLICABLE, or "N/A").

>> We filed insurance for the item and it was paid. It's actually a TRUE rating

> because

>> the item never made it, but the other two excellent ratings are applicable.

> It would be really dumb to rate a user's speed based on how long it took the post

> office to deliver (or not deliver).

> I would think speed of responding to messages, speed of sending (after trade penned

> or after receiving depending on terms of the trade).

> The one aspect of a trade a user doesn't have control over is what happens once the

> package in possession of the courier.

Fully agree - but in the context of the trade, the item was sent, lost in transit by USPS, and never arrived. I'd think it's fair for the buyer who purchased the item, saw tracking in the agreed upon time, but never received the item to leave a N/A because the speed is not applicable as it never arrived due to being lost. He still left an excellent for the other two fields as I worked with him and helped him get the insurance claim filed, but I understand why he would leave the N/A. I wasn't arguing the reason he left the N/A, just the fact that Kommie said "So they tried to give you a bad rating but really didn't give you a rating at all." I don't consider the "N/A" to be a bad rating - on top of it, the buyer left the context in the rating comment.

Scott

22-Jan(#45)

Here I was thinking I had perfect ratings, but come to find out, one person rated me "good" on speed a few years back and left the site shortly after. I have disgraced my family.

Bofur

25-Jan(#46)

Chad wrote:

> #22 - @Bofur 257 ratings

A funny coincidence that my handles are Bofur22 - I gladly accept this spot.

Chad

25-Jan(#47)

Scott wrote:

> Here I was thinking I had perfect ratings, but come to find out, one person rated

> me "good" on speed a few years back and left the site shortly after. I have disgraced

> my family.

If you have anything like a "World's Greatest Dad" mug or something like that, you need to return it to your children and explain why you are not worthy of such a mug.

benstylus

* 26-Jan(#48)

Chad wrote:

> Scott wrote:

>> Here I was thinking I had perfect ratings, but come to find out, one person rated

>> me "good" on speed a few years back and left the site shortly after. I have disgraced

>> my family.

> If you have anything like a "World's Greatest Dad" mug or something like that, you

> need to return it to your children and explain why you are not worthy of such a mug.

It is acceptable to keep this mug if you have it, as long as you are a right-handed drinker.
image