Lunar
* 28-Sep-2022(#1)
Discussion for all things Analogue.
Duo coming out soon, fingers crossed.
But for starters, let's take a look at Pocket.
NES and SNES unlocked.
As far as I can tell, there's no other comparison for FPGA on a portable screen.
It. Is. Good.
imageimage Staraang
29-Sep-2022(#3)The Duo looks sweet. I just signed up. Why is everything they sell out of stock? Supply chain issues still a problem?
Lunar
29-Sep-2022(#7)Renaissance2K wrote:> It's hard to understate my glee in having a portable FPGA-based NES and SNES.
Yea, I don't think people realize how good this is. I took it for a test drive, it is excellent.
Only other feature I really want would be the sleep/resume(suspend) function.
The Spiritualized cores (GB/C/A, SMS) do support it, so I think it's only a matter of time.
Noid
30-Sep-2022(#11)benstylus wrote:> Admiral wrote:
>> Wow, these are pricey
>
> They are pricy but fpga is the best emulation technology out there.
>
>
>
Quizzle! Can anyone name lone Analogue console that doesn't use FPGA technology?
Noid
30-Sep-2022(#13)Lunar wrote:> Analogue NT
>
>
I'll certainly accept that since it is correct. Though, I was actually looking for another answer. Any other guesses?
Noid
30-Sep-2022(#15)Renaissance2K wrote:> That wooden Neo Geo console they made used actual MVS guts, correct?
>
>
Yup! That's it! That's the one!! But, bonus points to @Lunar for remembering what I'd forgot.
ChronoLe
30-Sep-2022(#16)I haven't had time to look into the light mods for the NGPC yet, so looking forward to the NGPC adapter. Duo would be lovely too.
Lunar
3-Oct-2022(#20)Admiral wrote:> For my money, I'd prefer to spend $100 on an emulation handheld vs $1000 for an FPGA.
>
> Granted, I should have preordered the Pocket NT when I had the chance at regular
> price...but in the market today, that's simply too much for a video game handheld.
Where are you getting $1000?
Admiral
3-Oct-2022(#21)benstylus wrote:> Admiral wrote:
>> For my money, I'd prefer to spend $100 on an emulation handheld vs $1000 for an
> FPGA.
>
> Enjoy your imperceptibly inferior gaming.
>
>
>
Admiral
4-Oct-2022(#22)Lunar wrote:> Admiral wrote:
>> For my money, I'd prefer to spend $100 on an emulation handheld vs $1000 for an
> FPGA.
>>
>> Granted, I should have preordered the Pocket NT when I had the chance at regular
>> price...but in the market today, that's simply too much for a video game handheld.
>
> Where are you getting $1000?
>
>
There were a couple that went for that much, but you are right I'm seeing more like $500-$700 depending on condition. Point is still the same
Lunar
4-Oct-2022(#23)benstylus wrote:> Admiral wrote:
>> For my money, I'd prefer to spend $100 on an emulation handheld vs $1000 for an
> FPGA.
>
> Enjoy your imperceptibly inferior gaming.
>
Ignorance is bliss, as they say.
But hey, enjoy what you enjoy, no judgment here.
benstylus
* 4-Oct-2022(#25)Lunar wrote:> benstylus wrote:
>> Admiral wrote:
> |>> For my money, I'd prefer to spend $100 on an emulation handheld vs $1000 for
> an
>> FPGA.
>>
>> Enjoy your imperceptibly inferior gaming.
>>
>
> Ignorance is bliss, as they say.
>
> But hey, enjoy what you enjoy, no judgment here.
Thanks, I shall. Just poking some mild fun at gaming snobs who sneer at using anything less than the 100% best equipment available.
People who talk about their setup like most people would talk about their children.
To this I say... many of the folks who developed for older consoles did so with the understanding that their games would be viewed on crt screens through standard AV cables or even (GASP) an RF switch.
Who are we to say that blurriness and interlacing wasn't the intended way to play these games (especially N64 games hahaha)
benstylus
* 4-Oct-2022(#27)Lunar wrote:> 2. re: developer intent: who are you, or anyone to say what they intended?
I'm benstylus.
In all seriousness though, there are visual tricks developers used with interlacing and dithering and stuff that isn't really noticeable until you play it on the so-called better equipment, and it looks markedly worse on modern TVs. I would posit that the developer's intent was for those visual tricks to work correctly or they wouldn't have programmed them.
> 3. You don't use RF the same reason you don't use sundial anymore to tell time, or
> a typewriter anymore to type a word document, or a horse carriage to commute, or
> go to the outhouse to take a piss.
I use fountain pens, so I can still lay claim to old fashionedness thank you very much.
benstylus
4-Oct-2022(#31)Lunar wrote:> It's actually better on a smaller screen such as the Analogue Pocket truth be told.
>
> Man, a "hardware snob" must have left some deep scars within you.
Not specifically hardware snobs, but any kind of snobby/gatekeeping behavior just immediately gets me into ocular gymnastics.
benstylus
* 4-Oct-2022(#33)Lunar wrote:> 😂 kinda like telling people the right way to emulate?
Sorry, but I don't see being anti-piracy as gatekeeping or snobbery.
You could argue that the companies themselves are gatekeeping by not keeping their games in print (either physically or digitally), and I would probably agree with that to some extent
Especially because I am very much for companies re-releasing their older titles via emulation on modern systems.
I want all games to be affordable and available to anyone. Well, almost all games. There's a whole genre I wish would just go away and I will be extremely snobby about that if pressed.
Lunar
* 4-Oct-2022(#35)benstylus wrote:>...I will be extremely snobby about that if pressed.
That's the irony here.
Anyway, to wrap up this pointless debate, no one said you NEED to play FPGA, but better and higher quality hardware exist.
benstylus
4-Oct-2022(#36)Lunar wrote:> benstylus wrote:
> |>...I will be extremely snobby about that if pressed.
>
> That's the irony here.
>
> Anyway, to wrap up this pointless debate, no one said you NEED to play FPGA, but
> better and higher quality hardware exist.
The real irony is thst for the longest time people were snobs about playing on original hardware compared to cheap emulation machines.
Now that FPGA exists and is way more expensive than original hardware in most cases, people can't get enough of it.
Lunar
4-Oct-2022(#37)benstylus wrote:> The real irony is thst for the longest time people were snobs about playing on original
> hardware compared to cheap emulation machines.
>
> Now that FPGA exists and is way more expensive than original hardware in most cases,
> people can't get enough of it.
>
I guess we are continuing. Who are we talking about here?
Original hardware is still good. As far as people in my retro circle, everyone who has Analogue machines still have most of their original hardware.
Lunar
* 4-Oct-2022(#41)Admiral wrote:> Emulation is REALLLLY good right now. Almost not noticeably different than FPGA...but
> the cost is 5x as much.
It should be clear by now, this varies from person to person. It's hugely noticeably different to some people. So there you have it.
If it's the same for you, that's good for you. Feel free to keep using the Mini consoles. Nothing wrong with that.