Scott wrote:> nonamesleft wrote:
>> theJaw wrote:
> |>> If the remakes would have had the same “toy” aesthetic as the Link’s Awakening
>> remake,
> |>> I’m glad they opted to just port them to NSO. I’m sure it’s a fine remake
>> but I’m
> |>> not into the look of it and will almost always prefer playing older games like
>> that
> |>> with the original retro look they were released with.
>> Did you play both? I played one of them, Ages I think, but not Seasons. Wondering
>> if it's worth playing the other.
>
> It's very much worth playing both of them. A lot of people seem to think they're
> basically the same game, but with minor differences (kinda like Pokemon) but that
> is not the case at all. They are completely different, but each one is still a full
> Zelda game on it's own. Ages revolves around a time travel gimmick, while Seasons
> uses a mechanic that lets you change the season, which alters the landscape. On top
> of that, if you beat one of them, it will give you a code. If you enter that code
> when you start a playthrough of the OTHER game, you will start what is referred to
> as a "linked game". There are some story elements that carry over, and then when
> you beat the second game, there's some really cool bonus content at the end, that
> can only be experienced after beating a linked game.
Maybe I'll give Seasons a go. Could go for some of those old tunes 🎶