Sun
2-Oct-2019(#1)Other thread was closed...so here we are.
Anyone else excited for AEW Dynamite tonight?
BucketofJustice
15-Mar-2023(#202)Fine. You wanna promo, I’ll start at the top. There ain’t no better than this.
You know they say that all men are created equal, but you look at me and you look at you and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one on one with another wrestler, you got a 50/50 chance of winning. But I'm a bucket of justice and I'm not normal! So you got a 25%, AT BEST, at beat me. Then you add probably PizzatheHutt to the mix, your chances of winning drastic go down. See the 3 way at GTZ, you got a 33 1/3 chance of winning, but I, I got a 66 and 2/3 chance of winning, because PizzatheHutt KNOWS he can't beat me and he's not even gonna try!
So Jaw, take your 33 1/3 chance, minus my 25% chance and you got an 8 1/3 chance of winning at GTZ. But then you take my 75% chance of winning, if we was to go one on one, and then add 66 2/3 per cents, I got 141 2/3 chance of winning at GTZ. Senor Jaw, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for you at GTZ.
PizzaTheHutt
23-Mar-2023(#209)I saw a clip on Twitter where Alexa Bliss was a guest on The Masked Singer. I've never watched that show and her being on it isn't enough to make me want to change that, so that isn't what this post is about. But what I noticed was the on-screen graphic when she was revealed that said "Five-time WWE Women's Champion" and that just made me think back to when being a five time champion was actually a big deal. But now it feels like when you sign with WWE these days, five title reigns is the least you'll get. I can recall only one of Alexa Bliss' five title reigns.
Bret Hart was a five time WWF Champion. "Stone Cold" Steve Austin was a six time WWF Champion. The Undertaker and Shawn Michaels had four title runs each. Booker T of course five time WCW Champion. That feels like nothing now, compared to the Randy Ortons, John Cenas, Triple Hs and Charlotte Flairs of the modern era. For the longest time from 2002 - 2017-ish, HHH, Cena, Orton or Roman (as a babyface) as champion meant I automatically wasn't looking forward to the main event of the next PPV.
With Triple H in charge, it sure seems like he is in favor of longer, more meaningful title runs. Asuka's 510 day title reign in NXT is a good example, it was excellent and certainly more meaningful than all of Charlotte's 3,281 runs with the women's titles on the main roster (okay, that's an exaggerated number...but only slightly). Who knows how much longer it could've went on for if she hadn't gotten injured? Gunther is doing his best to make the IC title relevant again. Bianca Belair makes a damn good champion herself.
So my question is, how do you guys feel about the longer title reigns, and how long is too long? For example, I feel like I would've been happy with another year of The Bloodline stuff, but I accept it is time to get the titles off of Roman and The Usos. I'm fine with how the tag titles are going to play out, but for the other, Cody wouldn't have been my first choice, but I'm fine with him too because it still makes sense and the crowd will eat it up. It'd take some phenomenal booking to make me want to sit through a 2 years period of Cody being on top though. But he also can't drop it too soon or it'd make his entire story feel like it was all for nothing.
PizzaTheHutt
23-Mar-2023(#213)Yeah, I left out Ric Flair in my list because his title reigns are combined through multiple companies (and WWE doesn't even count them all in their canon or the number would be higher).
What I meant with Gunther, his in-ring work being great as well as the booking helps make the title relevant, definitely. I'm not convinced Otis could be pulling off this kind of reign.
Good booking is important and is the key to how I could tolerate Roman being on top for 2 years. He's still not very good in-ring imo, but because he has been so good at playing a cool heel it helps make it easier to overlook that. Now if only Vince had the balls to pull the trigger on a Cena heel turn in the late 2000s...
With Bret's title reigns, the lengths of his reigns weren't as important because he wasn't defending the title on Raw every week or on monthly PPVs (I think they only started doing a PPV every month in 1999). But each title win was memorable and meant something. Can't really say that for Alexa Bliss (just using her as an example, I don't blame her for it because she has no say in the matter) whose 5 title runs happened in much less time than Bret's whole WWF run as a main eventer. Charlotte as well, will beat her dad's record while not being an active wrestler even close to the amount of time he was doing it full time for. If her title reigns were longer, meaning there'd be less of them, they might mean something. As of now, she is I think at #14, and according to cagematch stats, 6 of her reigns were less than a month long, 3 were less than a week (2 of those were MITB being cashed-in on her immediately after winning). For her, imo she needed fewer and longer title reigns.
theJaw
* 24-Mar-2023(#215)BucketofJustice wrote:> I wasn’t saying Ambrose/Mox is the worst of the 3. At that time, the US title meant
> practically nothing and there wasn’t as much focus on him as there was on the other
> two as tag champs even. He was the least important member of the Shield at that time.
> If you want to see that as something else, OK I guess.
No, don't be so hasty, I just didn't understand what you were saying... which is why I said I wasn't sure how one would measure importance. It seemed like you were saying overall, as in the long run. At the time, sure, he was booked to be the least important in Vince's eyes (for whatever reason) despite easily being the most over. Never really understood their apprehension with just getting behind the dude until they had to neuter his character and have him talk to plants as a face and/or wear a goofy gas mask as a heel. The self destruction that took/takes place in WWE always baffles me.
Imagine how much better the main event of WM32 would have been if they just had Triple H either a) lose the Rumble to Ambrose, or b) drop the title to him at Roadblock the next month? Built-in Shield story, a guy the crowd actually wanted to see in the main event, etc. But instead Triple H holds his "star power" above upward mobility for the younger wrestlers and slots himself in, and it's easily Top 5 worst Mania main events of all time, at THE worst Mania of all time (imo) and only served to make the audience even more anti-Reigns at the time.
theJaw
* 24-Mar-2023(#224)PizzaTheHutt wrote:> This has been the least hyped I've felt for a WrestleMania in years. The Bloodline
> stuff has been good, but I dunno, maybe not good enough to carry the whole event
> on its shoulders.
>
> Still am hyped to a degree though. Gonna spend the whole weekend doing nothing but
> watching rasslin'.
>
>
Yah that’s what I do too, watch old/other graps to get in the mood. I haven’t been truly hyped for a Mania in a long while but usually always end up having a good enough time with the pals I watch with.
As good as the Bloodline stuff has been, it really is this IC Title triple threat I’m most looking forward to.
theJaw
28-Mar-2023(#231)BucketofJustice wrote:> Why are FTR to the point of leaving if they can’t beat the Ass Boys? Didn’t they
> come back like 2 or 3 weeks ago or something? How did this happen? What did I miss?
The Ass Boys refused to grant them a title shot under any circumstances until Dax put their AEW careers on the line. The Gunns kept getting involved with FTR during the FTR/Briscoes feud so this had been lingering. I think they’re playing off FTR’s “will they/won’t they” go back to WWE contract situation.
theJaw
* 28-Mar-2023(#235)I just don’t see it as a downgrade, especially when you consider that the rosters are interchangeable anyways. Claudio, Joe, Yuta, Briscoe, etc… they’re all technically ROH and don’t feel like they’ve been downgraded whatsoever because they can all still appear on either show. Obviously if FTR’s AEW contracts expire, they wouldn’t be signing EXCLUSIVE contracts to ROH. They’d still be able to swap wherever, whenever, depending on the booking.
And they’re not really playing any contract stuff up directly ON AEW programming, Dax just talks about it on his own (maybe too much). Khan famously doesn’t get involved in how wrestlers go about their outside ventures or social media presence the way WWE does (for better or for worse) so Dax is free to drop teases either way all he wants. That’s why no one knows the legitimate reason for the titles vs career match - is it just AEW catching wind of internet buzz and playing a little inside baseball, or are FTR actually planning on taking off in April? But I agree, I don't see them taking off anytime soon.
As for ol’ Vincent Kennedy, there are major red flags that were reported on just the other day. Apparently shows are suddenly being rewritten day-of far more than ever since Triple H took over, certain gimmicks are being eased back toward the direction Vince wanted them before stepping away, and apparently there has been a “Mr McMahon’s Office” sign backstage every week for a while. Heck, they even reshot a promo recently to remove the word “wrestling” from it. Not saying they’ll ever come right out and admit he’s in charge again, but Triple H even already acknowledged that he gives input so its possible he's doing that more often nowadays. Which would be fudging terrible considering Vince is trash garbage. Though I’ll admit WWE has only been slightly better, VERY slightly better, with Triple H in charge. Don’t know how one can watch the Wyatt crap, or the Women’s division in general, and consider Triple H all that great a booker haha
theJaw
* 29-Mar-2023(#237)Admittedly, NXT was a lot better booked, you’re right. But Triple H, at this point, has had enough time to course correct from Vince’s vision far more than he has. To his credit, the Mysterio angle is all him and that’s finally been getting entertaining, and he seems to be sticking the landing with Bloodline (even if that started with Vince). But just about the entire rest of the card for most shows is still on the dull side imo. Just seems like more of the same, with slight improvements in some corners of the shows.
Wyatt can take some of the blame for his stuff too, I guess he has a bit more control over his character, but at the end of the day, it’s still the booker’s call to allow him to have that control. The buck stops at Triple H. And to be fair, I highly doubt it was Wyatt’s idea to cripple any mystique his character or the Uncle Howdy angle had by booking a neon, glow in the dark Mountain Dew advertisement for one of his first PPV matches back. Silly decisions like that, or having Lashley arbitrarily body Uncle Howdy right off the show, leans a lot more “classic WWE booking” than anything else.
BucketofJustice
29-Mar-2023(#240)I don’t understand why some people is saying that Vince is there and is in creative. Whoever is starting needs to stop being dumb. It might seem like it sometimes, but people are quick to forget a few things. First, WWE’s DNA is full of Vince. Like, the company and him are synonymous and have been for decades. Second, Triple H learned under Vince. While he obviously likes other stuff too like Crockett and whatnot, Vince taught HHH and even if other people also taught him things, it was all done in WWE. Third, Nick Khan went out and said Vince wasn’t in creative. That absolutely 100% has to be the truth, because he’s a company officer and if he’s lying then that has serious SEC implications written all over it. Especially since they’re in sale mode and Vince was ousted because the dangling dingle dangled too much and the NDAs were found, there’s no way Vince should endanger any of that. He has billions to make.
No, the booking isn’t perfect, but there’s no way that WWE would have a paradigm shift in philosophy because HHH took over. He still has work to do, like with the women in general and making most of his rehires seem important, and making anything not Bloodline-related matter more. But, what’s hitting right now is fantastic. I hope after we’re done with Mania, we see some improvements.
theJaw
* 29-Mar-2023(#241)Nick Khan also said there were no fights in the stands for the past 15 years in an attempt to make WWE seem all shiny and nice despite there being one in Boston a few months ago. He’s a yes man, and has been caught in lies numerous times. Same with Vince. Same with Triple H. Again, Triple H literally already admitted that Vince has input in his creative, it’s really not hard to believe that the shady dude who has a history of playing by his own rules may be doing the same thing right now. He’s obviously not back in any official capacity, but he is confirmed to be there weekly, it’s nowhere near out of the realm of possibility that he’s pushing Triple H toward his desired booking. Dude already changed the WWE bylaws via SEC filing even after stepping down, he’ll do what he wants regardless. As long as they don’t come outright and officially give him the job, they can do whatever they want.
To Pizza’s point, we saw how Triple H can book when Vince isn’t pressing him with NXT, there’s likely a reason it’s so wildly different now. Thankfully it’s not as bad as when Vince had full reign, but it’s mostly just dull. Again, just my opinion, but for my money, The Bloodline stuff is the only truly fantastic thing about WWE right now. Some of that is actually competent booking for once, and some of that is because it’s being compared to the turd Vince has squatted out for the past decade, so anything would look like gold in comparison. Even the Sami/KO stuff depended on a segment hawking t-shirts on the road to Mania, so there are still some whiffs even in that angle.
I also hope it steps up more after Mania, but I feel like people have been saying that for months. “I’m sure after SummerSlam Triple H will pick it up”, etc etc. He’s had enough time to start steering it that way, but so far he’s only been riding the Bloodline angle with a few decent storylines sprinkled underneath it. I just want it to be better, but if you’re digging it now, that rules. Folks should watch what they enjoy.